A Tesla factory worker allegedly attacked a 65-year-old coworker during a prayer break last December, got fired, and months later killed three people in Austin.
Quick Take
- Elon Musk says Tesla fired Ndiaga Diagne in December 2025 after he violently assaulted a woman who stepped on his prayer rug.
- Court records show the alleged victim, Lillian Mendoza Brady, sued Tesla claiming Diagne attacked her during a company-sanctioned prayer break.
- Diagne is accused of killing three people on Austin’s Sixth Street in March 2026, months after his firing.
- A separate worker account described the contact as a “gentle” push, not a violent assault, raising questions about exact details.
- Workplace violence data shows fired employees cause a disproportionate share of deadly office shootings, making the firing timeline worth scrutiny.
Musk Connects A Factory Floor Incident To A Mass Shooting
Elon Musk dropped the bombshell during an October 20 interview with biographer Walter Isaacson on The Builders. Musk said a man worked at Tesla’s Austin factory until December, then got fired for a violent reason. “He was fired because he assaulted a woman who stepped on his prayer rug in the factory,” Musk said. “She accidentally stepped on his prayer rug and he assaulted her. Violently assaulted her.”
Musk did not name the man publicly in that moment, but the pieces line up with a case already working through Texas courts. The timeline he described matches a lawsuit filed months before his comments aired, giving his account an unusual anchor in actual legal paperwork rather than just a casual remark.
The Lawsuit Behind The Headline
Lillian Mendoza Brady, 65, filed an amended complaint in Travis County District Court naming Ndiaga Diagne as her attacker. She claims Diagne “violently and without provocation physically assaulted” her during a sanctioned prayer break in a common area at the Tesla facility. Brady is now suing Tesla for more than one million dollars, arguing the company failed to protect her on the job.
Reporting from Scripps News adds another layer to the story. Brady’s attorneys say Tesla withheld Diagne’s identity from her after the attack, forcing her to pursue legal action just to learn who allegedly hurt her. That detail matters. If true, it suggests Tesla knew enough about the incident to respond internally, yet kept the alleged victim in the dark about who had attacked her.
A Conflicting Account Muddies The Picture
Not every version of events matches Musk’s dramatic framing. A Tesla worker who spoke with the Austin American-Statesman described the contact differently. That source said Diagne claimed a supervisor stepped on his prayer mat and told him it could not stay on the factory floor. Diagne then reportedly responded by “gently pushing” the supervisor off the mat, which led to his firing.
That account does not erase the seriousness of the lawsuit. But it does show the public record is not fully settled on exactly how physical the altercation got, or whether the person involved was a coworker or a supervisor. A separate report notes the publicly available complaint does not independently confirm Musk’s specific prayer-rug detail or the stated reason for Diagne’s dismissal. An allegation in a lawsuit is not the same as a proven fact, and that distinction matters even when the underlying story is deeply disturbing.
🚨Revelations Link Austin Mass Shooting Suspect to Prior Workplace Assault at Tesla Facility
​
New disclosures from Elon Musk indicate that the individual responsible for the Austin mass shooting had previously been dismissed from a Tesla manufacturing facility following an… pic.twitter.com/Os954BGdnt— Amy Leigh (@IAmyLeigh) October 21, 2026
Why The Firing Timeline Deserves Attention
Workplace violence researchers have long flagged the period right after a termination as especially dangerous. One review of lethal violence databases found that former employees commit about 21 percent of workplace insider homicides overall, but a full 33 percent of workplace active shooter incidents. That statistic does not prove Diagne’s firing caused the Austin shooting. It does show why employers, courts, and the public take these chronologies seriously.
Three families in Austin lost someone on Sixth Street in March. A woman in her sixties says she was attacked on a factory floor months earlier. Tesla sits in the middle of both stories, facing a lawsuit and now a very public claim from its own chief executive. The full truth will likely come out through discovery, depositions, and whatever records Tesla is forced to produce in Brady’s ongoing case.
Sources:
thegatewaypundit.com, x.com, courthousenews.com
