NPR CEO Katherine Maher admits the organization made a mistake by failing to cover the Hunter Biden laptop story as executives from NPR and PBS face scrutiny over taxpayer funding and allegations of political bias.
Key Takeaways
- NPR CEO Katherine Maher acknowledged during congressional testimony that NPR should have covered the Hunter Biden laptop story more aggressively, admitting a significant editorial failure.
- Republican lawmakers questioned the appropriateness of continued taxpayer funding for public media outlets they claim demonstrate consistent left-leaning bias in coverage decisions.
- NPR has faced criticism for multiple controversial editorial choices, including promoting a book titled “In Defense of Looting” and falsely reporting that U.S. Park Police used tear gas on White House protesters.
- The Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency (DOGE) held a hearing specifically addressing alleged bias at NPR and PBS, with Republicans arguing these outlets primarily serve an elite, urban liberal audience.
- Critics argue funding public media represents a regressive wealth transfer from working families to outlets that predominantly serve affluent audiences.
NPR and PBS Executives Face Congressional Grilling
NPR CEO Katherine Maher and PBS CEO Paula Kerger testified before the House Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency (DOGE) in a hearing titled “Anti-American Airwaves: Holding the heads of NPR and PBS Accountable.” The contentious session focused on allegations of political bias at both taxpayer-funded media organizations, with Republican lawmakers questioning whether continued public funding is appropriate given what they characterize as leftist editorial slants.
During her testimony, Maher admitted NPR made a significant mistake in its handling of the Hunter Biden laptop story. The organization’s original dismissal of the story was criticized as demonstrating political favoritism. Maher’s acknowledgment represents a shift from NPR’s initial position when Managing Editor Terence Samuel justified the blackout by suggesting the story was a distraction.
“We don’t want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories, and we don’t want to waste the listeners’ and readers’ time on stories that are just pure distractions,” said Samuel.
🚨In the wake of the DOGE subcommittee hearing yesterday, Trump calls for the defunding of NPR and PBS, "IMMEDIATELY."
NPR Chief Katherine Maher is a woke radical and both orgs are leftwing propaganda mills.
Not a penny more of our tax dollars should be spent supporting them. pic.twitter.com/KTmqoKbpeg
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) March 27, 2025
History of Controversial Editorial Decisions
Critics point to numerous examples of what they consider biased reporting by NPR. These include the organization’s promotion of a book titled “In Defense of Looting,” its misleading description of fetal heartbeats as merely “sounds from the fetus,” and false reporting that U.S. Park Police used tear gas on protesters outside the White House. Additionally, NPR faced backlash for incorrectly portraying Donald Trump Jr.’s Senate testimony and creating a podcast linking country music to racism.
Debate Over Continued Taxpayer Funding
Subcommittee Chairwoman Marjorie Taylor Greene criticized both NPR and PBS for what she characterized as serving a narrow audience of “mostly wealthy, white, urban liberals and progressives.” She noted declining audiences for public broadcasting and questioned whether continued federal subsidies could be justified when these outlets appear to be out of touch with large segments of the American public, particularly rural communities.
PBS CEO Paula Kerger defended public broadcasting, emphasizing its local focus and community service. She characterized PBS as fundamentally American and highlighted its 60-year history of educational programming. Democratic members of the committee used humor and references to Sesame Street characters to counter Republican criticisms, suggesting the hearing was politically motivated rather than focused on genuine concerns about bias.
Testimony From Outside Experts
Michael Gonzalez from the Heritage Foundation testified that NPR and PBS consistently demonstrate “scorn for conservative views” while relying on congressional allies to secure their funding year after year. He characterized public media funding as a “regressive tax” that forces working families to subsidize media consumed primarily by more affluent Americans.
Despite these criticisms, Maher insisted during her testimony that NPR remains committed to unbiased, nonpartisan reporting. She outlined steps taken to improve editorial review processes and claimed the organization strives to maintain journalistic integrity. The hearing highlighted the ongoing debate about the role of public media in an increasingly polarized society and whether government funding mechanisms create appropriate accountability for balanced reporting.
